Interact with these doodles to jump to the topic in the video

00:00:00 Hi everyone I m Kadambari Sahu. I'm the head of design at Value Labs. Design Inspire is

00:00:14 the web series of passionate innovative and young inspiring designers. The web series

00:00:20 dive into their passion inspiration and what makes them go. It's an effort to understand

00:00:25 how they are navigating their career path and how they are investing their creative

00:00:30 energies. We believe hearing their bold moves and inspiring stories that will ignite interest

00:00:34 and inspired the next generation of budding designers across the globe. So let's go forward.

00:00:41 Hello everyone welcome to design inspire. Our today's guest is Katerina Markova. Katerina

00:00:46 is a designer with experience and variety of roles from contributor to design leadership.

00:00:50 She has worked in B2B and B2C environment. She has worked with companies like Namecheap

00:00:55 where she has led the entire brand experience division good data where she, she was responsible

00:01:01 for user experience of analytical dashboards and Oracle, where she worked on a developer

00:01:06 oriented platform to build channel agnostic Chabot s. At last she joined McKinsey and

00:01:12 company. When she split her time between designing unique experiences for client facing digital

00:01:16 product, promoting the value of design across the organization and helping non-designers

00:01:20 to bring user centric, design principles into their day-to-day work. Welcome Katerina. How

00:01:26 are you doing today?

00:01:29 Hi kadambari I'm fine. How are you?

00:01:33 Good good. Katrina. So Katerina, I call you Kat for most of the, the session now. So Kat,

00:01:42 what we'll do is, there, the format of the show would be something like this. The first

00:01:48 part is where you talk about anything, which inspires you or motivates you or your design

00:01:52 journey or any stories that, you want to share with us. And the second part would be like

00:01:58 a conversation between me and you, where most of the questions that I'll ask you are collated

00:02:02 by the team here for user experience group at Valuelabs. So let's go forward, and hear

00:02:07 your story. We're very excited to hear them, over to you Katerina.

00:02:13 Thank you. So let me share my screen with you. So hi everyone. I'm Kat, I'm super excited

00:02:22 to be here today because when I got the invite to join, it was my birthday. And when the

00:02:29 invite said the initiative is about connecting young, inspiring designers, I was like, this

00:02:36 is your last chance because people won't call you that for much longer. So that's so here

00:02:41 I am today and thank you kadambari for intro, because I don't have to do that. I think it

00:02:50 would be a good moment to say that, in your opinions that I'll share with you today, are

00:02:56 my own indicators of my employer and. I also need to apologize because I think, the topic

00:03:05 of the talk that originally, I, I said I would do, was about diverging converging and iteration,

00:03:13 and my journey as a designer, but, in disappearance of the series, and sharing about our passions

00:03:21 and what keeps us going, I decided to share with you a project that I have been working

00:03:26 on for as long as I can remember. And, it's also sort of this project that's, I met Kadambari

00:03:33 at the interaction 20 conference in Milan distributary back when the world was still

00:03:38 normal. So today I'll be talking about, The Dead People Project and the sensitivity report

00:03:46 design is I guess, in a sense, a diverging converging and iterations are, are inevitably

00:03:53 a part of my story. Anyway and that is because it's the underlying principle of this whole

00:03:59 project, but also talk about why being as designers should care about depth of our users.

00:04:07 Long story short, eventually argues us will die and we can make it easier on them. And

00:04:12 they're very used by acknowledging it from the start. So the project really isn't one

00:04:19 single project. It's mostly a collection of research thinking, writing, talking, and the

00:04:26 topics that I cover evolve. As I learn new things, I do have a name for it in several

00:04:33 languages. I used to name it as people project in English. And what the news, when I speak

00:04:37 about it in Portuguese or my talking and I speak about it in check. If you wonder why

00:04:43 these three languages it's because I spend a considerable amount of time in, these cultures

00:04:50 and different parts of the work in one of these languages and their respective and the

00:04:57 context of different cultures. I embarked on this journey about 15 years ago when my

00:05:02 dad died and my sister and I had to deal with his legacy. Although Facebook wasn't a thing

00:05:09 yet. And, mostly line services we use today for it at miler dealing with his digital assets

00:05:15 was so challenging that I began to ask myself that if there was a way I could contribute

00:05:21 to change over the time, I imagined Michelle room with a problem, looking for answers to

00:05:29 the question, how might we improve and support grieving in a world that is increasingly digital

00:05:34 became an intrinsic part of my life. It frustrates me for several reasons. For one I'm intrigued

00:05:43 by the complexity, because it touches many different areas like law, ethics, psychology

00:05:48 technology, and other areas within these areas. But it's also a global problem. The other

00:05:57 reason is its increasing relevance. The digitalization is ongoing and according to the recent international

00:06:04 data corporation reports. The amount of data created over the next three years, but will

00:06:09 be more than the data created over the past 40 years. And finally, I know we can do better.

00:06:16 The current state of things present us with, with a huge opportunities for improvement.

00:06:21 So enough of the intro. So let's start with what is digital death? In theory. That's curious

00:06:31 when a person becomes incapable of taking an active part in their digital life. In other

00:06:37 words, if I got run over a car today, my family would inherit a bunch of things like books,

00:06:43 my digital devices, perhaps some money, but I wouldn't be able to actively participate

00:06:49 in my digital life anymore. So I'd be digitally that by the way, Even if I die, I still participate

00:06:58 in individualized because I'm mostly keep most likely keep receiving emails or show

00:07:03 up in social networks, which brings a really interesting question. Is it even possible

00:07:09 to experience death in today's world when talking to people about this? At this point,

00:07:16 there is usually a light bulb moment. Their eyes brighten up and they say, ah, I got this.

00:07:23 It's about what happens to my Facebook when I die. Well, yes and no. Well, this is certainly

00:07:30 a topic personally. I think that unless the disease left clear instructions on how to

00:07:35 handle their social media after their death, it should be at the discretion of the berries.

00:07:42 I'm way more interested in what a person's death means. Practically. When it comes to

00:07:46 digital assets, what effects it has on the people left behind. And ultimately what we

00:07:52 can do as individuals or society to facilitate these processes, to reduce the unnecessary

00:07:58 burden and overall improve the quality of coping with onslaughts in the physical world,

00:08:05 regardless of the geographical location, we have a set of established legal, social, and

00:08:11 cultural norms, and these norms help us through this situation. Into the digital world. However

00:08:19 conventions didn t necessarily are either inaccurate or non-existent. For example, in

00:08:25 the United States, the from fiduciary access to digital assets act was enacted in 2015.

00:08:35 It allows fiduciary is to manage digital property like domains or cryptocurrencies while keeping

00:08:42 the access to digital communication ministry. Until then the only legislation applicable

00:08:49 to digital communication was the electronic communications privacy act from 1986. It wasn't

00:08:56 even sure whether in levels intellectual property or not in European Union, the situation is

00:09:02 a much better. For example, GDPR, that introduces a very strong protection on information privacy,

00:09:10 explicitly States that it only applies to living data subjects which means that that

00:09:16 are not predictive at all. The individual state members have to do this on their own.

00:09:21 And the only various you do, therefore, the approach to digital reminds remains, relies

00:09:26 heavily on what individual companies decide. It's important to recognize that technology

00:09:33 most quickly. And we struggled to keep pace with that. In the meantime, we are mostly

00:09:38 on our own. We should be asking questions like. When the time comes, will somebody be

00:09:43 able to get to the utility bills that you're gloating in life to my email, or will someone

00:09:49 be able to access my base subscriptions and Counsel Dan, will someone be able to let my

00:09:55 customers know that I will no longer design their websites? How will my family know that

00:09:59 I had a regular account? And you could probably imagine many more. Luckily, there is a concept

00:10:08 of sensitivity that allows us to evaluate an item through highpotential depth, relate

00:10:12 to problems when designing interactive systems as well as to seek opportunities for their

00:10:19 improvement. So let me explain finally, what the word financial sensitivity means. Here's

00:10:26 the definition. Financial sensitivity is a novel humanistically grounded approach to

00:10:32 HCI research and design. That's recognizes and actively engages with the facts of mortality

00:10:39 dying and death into creation of interactive systems. And it was introduced in the year

00:10:46 2009 by Michael misdemeanor and under actuaries, who at the time, researchers at the university

00:10:52 of Toronto, when considering death and dying, the common human computer interaction approach

00:10:58 create and wait, what happens can have a traumatic impact on the emotional balance of the users.

00:11:04 My Mencher is proposed that we should let go of the technology and seek for inspiration

00:11:10 and knowledge in the realm of social sciences. You'll see clinical sensitivity as a lens

00:11:15 to look at problems at hand can help us to solve problems such as how do we deliver adequate

00:11:22 information to one's hands after somebody dies in a timely manner? What constitutes

00:11:27 inheritable data, which data should be considered private after one's death. How can we support

00:11:34 users to make an informed decision about which data should be shared after their death and

00:11:39 with whom if they don't leave instructions, what should be the default? How do we design

00:11:46 for groups of people who outlive one another or coexist in different phases of their lives?

00:11:54 So now, did I spoke a little bit about why and where we should take depth into consideration?

00:12:00 Let's look at a few examples of products and services that do it already messed up. Didn't

00:12:05 belong to so-called digital afterlife industry and fall into one of the following categories.

00:12:10 Plus humans messaging, online memorials information management, which also includes funeral and

00:12:16 digital estate planning and finally recreation services. So the first example, well, that

00:12:25 I want to share with you is some websites, called West summit. Nicely done website for

00:12:32 funeral planning. It must create the, for an NGO, which is a Czech NGO, and that provides

00:12:39 professional care to dying and their loved ones. The website itself allows its users

00:12:44 to write up their vicious regarding the final moments of their lives and sharing with people.

00:12:49 If their choice, it is possible to share everything or only its parts. Obviously, there are many

00:12:55 other services and of course, most of them in English then do a similar thing. These

00:13:01 websites have diverse mechanics of releasing to start information. Often the services prompt

00:13:07 periodic linear original user for a signal of life. In some cases, as several people

00:13:13 have to confirm once death before the information gets shared. But if any often deselected beneficiaries.

00:13:20 Have access to the information already during the original pressing slide. The primary reason

00:13:26 why these services don't safeguard the access to the information too much is the beneficiary

00:13:32 is often needs the access to the information really quickly after one stuff. Another example

00:13:40 is a websites might work well. If you used to be a Swedish digital, real estate, digital

00:13:48 estate planning website. And, I said to use to you and I chose this example precisely

00:13:55 because the long, the start is no longer exists. The service offers its users, the possibility

00:14:01 to specify their innovations for what should happen to their digital accounts. It was integrated

00:14:07 their long list of other services, and it's used as good decide. On anti whom, which accounts

00:14:16 should be deactivated or deleted. And in some cases, even what content should be modified

00:14:22 on their profiles. The service was launched in October, 2009. And while it had a far superior

00:14:29 user experience to its competitors, it was out of business by November, 2011. I'd like

00:14:35 to think that it was because they were ahead of the time, to make their business model

00:14:40 viable but, what I want to point out is that going through the trouble of setting up your

00:14:47 preference is for all your online accounts takes a lot of time initially. And especially

00:14:53 when it comes to the paid services, it's super frustrating when you go through all this and

00:14:59 then the service shuts down without a good replacement. If you other similar services

00:15:05 that emerged around the same time, like entrusted or legacy locker lasted a bit longer and they've

00:15:15 acquired, mostly by password management companies and they actually offer their users a succession

00:15:21 plan, which was much better than the previous example. One more example from the digital

00:15:30 estate planning category is a company called Ever plans.

00:15:33 They have a very different approach, because they provide an online tool that allows the

00:15:39 users to organize the information from both the physical and the digital worlds side by

00:15:45 side, next to the list of digital assets, you can enter your emergency information,

00:15:50 information about your employment vehicles, real estate, etc. and the information can

00:15:56 be private, but you can also decide to share it. Do you have any comments on this service?

00:16:02 Is that they offer a white labeled option. This is a great thing. For example, for attorneys

00:16:08 who can use this as an extension to their legacy management services, the advantage

00:16:14 is the declined. Confidentiality is maintained by the client, has access to update their

00:16:19 information as much as necessary comparable to a regular, well, this allows a far greater

00:16:25 control without the needs to rewrite it. Each time somebody changes the password. The last

00:16:33 example I'm going to share with you is a bit more futuristic sat beyond, as a company did

00:16:40 offers a combination of digital estate planning, but it also makes the leap towards recreation

00:16:48 services. They allow its users to set up messages to deliver it after one step. So the message

00:16:55 has done a very, it can be triggered by a specific date. For example, when somebody

00:17:01 has a birthday day or location, like the place that the deceased met, their partner or an

00:17:08 event like a birth of a child to be on the safer side, they ask the potential risks advanced

00:17:15 you're agreeing to receive the messages and to install their app on their device. But

00:17:22 since you're speaking of recreation services, there are already attempts to allow us to

00:17:27 build Chabot s that essentially mimic us and allow our loved ones to keep the conversation

00:17:33 going after the argon, sort of like what you can see in some of the black mirror episodes,

00:17:40 perhaps the best known of these experiments is called replica.ai. And there are lots of

00:17:46 ethical implications, but services like, like these are going to be are going to talk a

00:17:51 little bit about it in a moment. So there are some of the opportunities when considering

00:17:59 debt in the digital process, there is a number of challenges that we need to consider. And

00:18:07 so I'm going to share some of the most critical ones. First one being, how we might redefine

00:18:13 death related to rituals into digital worlds, to separate mental health of the dying and

00:18:19 theories. Until recently the rituals, we have allowed us a certain level of control over

00:18:26 how we encounter and experience death and dying with the rise of technology, however,

00:18:32 and the social media in particular, if you no longer have the option to grieve on our

00:18:37 own terms, Okay. As how might we improve policies to reduce burden processing one's digital

00:18:47 legacy. As I mentioned earlier, the regulations regarding digital assets are still in their

00:18:53 infancy, especially when it comes to addressing digital assets of the deceased. And as a result,

00:19:01 what we can or can't do with our digital estate is to a great extent shaped by commercial

00:19:06 companies or we have to spend a good amount of time finding our own workarounds. Another

00:19:14 one is how might we embrace the global nature of death and dying into digital world? We

00:19:20 need to be mindful of the fact that we use that the all use digital products and services

00:19:27 that are from all over the world. It's hard to devise a one size fits all approach or

00:19:33 best practices. Given the geographic variation of regulations and rituals. How am I? The

00:19:42 digital products and services verified uses death with certainity companies like Facebook

00:19:48 or LinkedIn and collect information about who died through online forums and even allow

00:19:54 you a bit of control of what you'd like to do with the information under their platform.

00:19:58 Once you are gone. Other companies like Google rely on user defined time thresholds to trigger

00:20:04 process of distributing data. According to user s preferences, there are also companies

00:20:10 that ask the users to pre-define and notify beneficiaries upfront. None of these systems

00:20:16 are a hundred percent reliable and they risk creating a lot of frustration and anxiety.

00:20:25 And finally, how might we ensure that what we do as ethical and not solid profit driven,

00:20:32 most of business decisions are based on growth and profitability. We mostly worry about attracting

00:20:39 new users and maximizing revenues through higher engagement rates. It'd be done as the

00:20:45 question, shall we do this often enough? As we both digital products and services, you

00:20:50 should seek ways to protect human dignity of the living dying and the deceased. So my

00:20:59 hope is that over the next year, we'll see a real change in how we approach death and

00:21:04 dying as well as digital legacy, especially if there's more and more active online users

00:21:10 die. I believe that there are a few ingredients that's going to help us collectively to improve.

00:21:16 And support grieving and a world does increasingly digital and they are the government regulations

00:21:23 need to catch up with the tech emotion. Businesses need to in-group ethical considerations into

00:21:30 their decision making processes and use this needs to improve their habits and managing

00:21:35 their digital information, which can be mostly useful to them while they're alive. But also

00:21:41 helps them leave their matters relatively well organized. If something happens to them,

00:21:46 finally, as designers, we have the unique opportunity to shape the digital products

00:21:52 and services to help our user s transition between the life and death. I end with a quote

00:22:00 by glacier game revolution doesn't happen when society adopts new technologies, it happens

00:22:07 when society adopts new behaviors. Thank you.

00:22:13 It was really thought provoking and, a big power, you know, Human existence in a way.

00:22:21 So, thank you for leaving us with lot of questions, which will eventually come up as a food for

00:22:27 thought, for, you know, most of us today. Now let us move to the second part of the,

00:22:34 show where we will converse. We'll talk about, you know, how your journey as a designer has

00:22:39 been. so let me start with the first way simple question that I asked most of our guests,

00:22:44 and that is when and how did you think of becoming a designer and how did it start for

00:22:51 you?

00:22:52 That's an, that's a good question. I, I think that we need , I always was a kid that likes

00:23:03 to play with many different things and I always sort of lean towards some sort of visual arts

00:23:08 and, I was in a Scot, like in the girl Scouts group. And like, we did lots of things. I

00:23:17 mean, one of my, one of the leaders that we had, she was, she was actually, doing visual,

00:23:27 education degree and so that was a big inspiration in the beginning, but it wasn't, then it wasn't

00:23:36 a given thing for me, for sure. I also consider it to do, Sign language, college. So among

00:23:46 all of these things, there's some things I was exploring. I managed to get into visual

00:23:52 design, college and, and over the time, I realized that I lean towards, digital, especially

00:24:06 when I, than wants to Portugal, to do an exchange program as part of my college degree. And

00:24:13 I had a class that was called publishing and editorial design. And essentially it was a

00:24:19 web design course. So I learned how to program back then in PHP and that's sort of how I

00:24:29 then translate it or into the user experience field, and sort of stuck with it ever since.

00:24:37 Oh, that's great and you worked in lot of places, lead different countries or be different

00:24:43 companies and figures, different roles. Do you want to talk about like your experience,

00:24:47 how it shaped up, you know, taking one bit at a time and then how did you transform into

00:24:53 different sort of domains?

00:24:56 Sure. So as I said my, my, my bachelor's degree is in visual design and my master's is, in

00:25:03 multimedia and so during my masters, I was in, I was in another program. It was, it was

00:25:15 an internship, in Austin, Texas and I was working with a bike BI Company. I didn't at

00:25:22 a time. I didn't necessarily know what I want to be doing, but that just happened. And so

00:25:29 through that, I got, I read, a recommendation or referral to Namecheap. and, and I started

00:25:44 focusing on the user experience way more, and through, through that and throughout my

00:25:50 career, I ended up, having experience working under marketing department and because I knew

00:25:57 a little bit of coding, obviously with engineers and. And I think that, it's super important

00:26:08 to me to understand that I can do something that I really enjoy doing. I can get paid

00:26:13 for what I enjoy doing and I guess like through interacting with all sorts of different people

00:26:21 and all sorts of different professions and having to solve for very different problems.

00:26:27 It just really helps me to navigate this space and, understand, the different points of view,

00:26:37 and relate with those areas a little bit more and I just find it super helpful to the fact

00:26:44 that I have this, diverse experience. And, I think one thing worth noting is, after I

00:26:54 left Namecheap. Where I was for about five years, and ended up leading this amazing brand

00:27:01 experience team. I decided that I didn't have enough experience, or like it has been too

00:27:09 long for me to be actually underground doing the design work, because my role there ended

00:27:15 up being way more managerial. And so I decided to take a step back and join a team as a designer,

00:27:23 as a contributor. To just kind of relearn, how it works and because obviously the, the

00:27:31 discipline and the UX, area has evolved over the time. So I was interested in understanding

00:27:37 how the teams work, differently and what I can bring, into my future, carrier. And so

00:27:45 through that I ended up going. I guess between different companies and I was always mindful

00:27:55 of like trying to get at the breath of the experience, into different roles or focusing

00:28:00 a little bit on different areas. For example, when, when I joined Oracle, I joined to focus

00:28:07 on user research because again, I was interested to like really, digging more into what user

00:28:13 research really means and how I can use it.

00:28:16 Yeah. So, I, I understand that, the sensitive, the project that, that people project is your

00:28:27 passion project, which started as a thesis project if I am correct in the multimedia

00:28:33 program that you did as an Master s. And then you continued working for it for some years.

00:28:39 So, how do you keep, keep up with it? Like, do you collaborate with people is like a time

00:28:44 that you have allocated for it. So how do you engage with it?

00:28:49 So actually it started even earlier. It started, as my bachelor's actually, and it isn't like,

00:29:02 it definitely is my passion project. It definitely is something that's not necessarily part of

00:29:07 my day to day. Although sometimes I try to, I tried to like talk to people about it and

00:29:13 I tried to figure out like, is there something we could do as the company or using the company

00:29:18 to, to just kind of change a little bit the way, how things are. But because it's a side

00:29:29 project, it definitely isn't a full-time thing. Right. And so the progress it's definitely

00:29:35 slower than I would like it to be just because of the nature and the amount of time I have

00:29:41 to deal with that. But, I think the key as to people, and. I ended up talking to a lot

00:29:51 of very inspiring people and just people who are generally interested. And I think the

00:29:58 biggest driver to move this forward is whenever I talk to someone about this very often, it's

00:30:07 something that nobody really consider it. And. And it always sparks a really good conversation

00:30:16 and a lot of the times, there are ideas that come out of these conversations that then

00:30:22 I can sort of take and do some more research on it, or, you know, like take it and somehow

00:30:28 bring it in to some of the thinking and some of the work that I'm doing, around this topic.

00:30:35 So how did the idea of digitalily after the life I go to you? Like, yeah. So how did it

00:30:43 start for you?

00:30:44 So, so it really was, it really was when my dad died. Right. Because, we had, I think

00:30:55 it started not necessarily as digital, it started just like by some frustrations that,

00:31:00 that I had around dealing with the legacy. Like, for example, when we showed up at the

00:31:05 notary who, in the Czech Republic, is in charge of sort of like guiding the family through,

00:31:12 through the legal process of distributing to legacy. Right. I have a, an older sister,

00:31:20 and we have the same father, but, we are not, and we actually have even the same last name,

00:31:25 but they are not, we don't have the same mother. And so she was officially listed, on his funeral

00:31:35 document. And so they knew to contact her. And so when I showed up with her at the office,

00:31:41 they almost shut the door in front of my face because they just didn't know that he had

00:31:47 two daughters. Right. And so I was like, how is this even possible? Like there are documents

00:31:54 there, there must be something like that. They can, look at, to understand like where

00:31:59 actually all the all the people who are supposed to inherit something. Right. And so that's

00:32:06 how it started. And then building onto that we were obviously trying to get rid of some

00:32:15 of the stuff that he had because, it was, we didn't need it or whatever. And so I was

00:32:20 going through, through his stuff. And when I was going through his computer, he has tons

00:32:29 of pictures, from our family vacations and whatnot and I, a picture of his girlfriend,

00:32:38 naked in a hotel room. And I was like, I really wish I could unseen this because that's just

00:32:45 like, not something you want to carry in your mind as a memory of your father, but, so,

00:32:53 so that was sort of like something that, that brought me onto the digital path of the things,

00:32:58 because I was like, well, you know, like, how am I supposed to make sense of his information

00:33:02 and how am I supposed to know what is the important stuff versus like, what is the stuff

00:33:07 that, you know, I shouldn't even look at like, so, so that was that.

00:33:13 So you've lived in different countries, right? Like Portugal and the cultural backgrounds

00:33:18 would have been very different. So was there any learning from these varied cultural backgrounds

00:33:25 that you were in?

00:33:28 Certainly there was many learnings from, from different cultural backgrounds. I think there

00:33:35 was many learnings just on personal level, right? Like, I think just the realization

00:33:41 that. And especially in Europe, right? Or like into Western countries, because like,

00:33:48 if you go to Asia or somewhere like the, the cultural differences are more apparent, but

00:33:54 in the Western world, we like, I guess you sort of assumed that. People function in similar

00:34:02 way, but, they just don't because there is a lot of history that, that sort of, shapes,

00:34:12 the culture, right. And how, how people approach their lives and stuff. And so I think like

00:34:18 for me, living in Portugal, it was. Away from me to realize how little I knew even about

00:34:27 my own culture, because people would ask you the question, like how is something in the

00:34:33 Czech Republic, right. All the time. And I just realized that what I know, even of my

00:34:38 own country is like a very limited, amount of, of stuff. And it just sort of made me

00:34:46 appreciate that fact. And also I think. Because I became much more aware of this. I became

00:34:54 also much more interested in those, cultural differences and to really, ask the questions

00:35:01 and be curious about like, where are people coming from, why they are thinking what they

00:35:05 are thinking. And I think it just like makes you much more humble and, you know, and you

00:35:16 don't jump into conclusions or like you don't make certain things that otherwise you would

00:35:20 just do. And then on the digital death or the dead people project, I think it was also

00:35:31 super interesting because, the way we experience, Death and dying and I guess like what happens

00:35:42 after somebody dies is, is very different. Even across Europe, in the Czech Republic,

00:35:48 like the person dies. And then, about a week later you have a funeral and that's about

00:35:55 it versus like in Portugal, for example, there is, They have a series of masses, that, they

00:36:04 start even today that the person dies and then it goes on in, in specific time periods,

00:36:09 for, for a while. And, and that again is something where you realize, like, we don't really hear

00:36:19 if you don't really have that time, to mentally process what's going on. Versus, obviously

00:36:28 there is a big debate whether like people, whether, the funeral, rituals, should be driven

00:36:38 by, by religious rituals, right or not, but it's, it's sort of gives you a little bit

00:36:45 of time to process what's going on and really be there with the feelings somebody's emotions

00:36:50 that you have. And. I think it's sort of healthy, but maybe I also think it's healthy because

00:36:57 I didn't necessarily have that. But, but yeah, there's, there's lots of things, that one

00:37:04 can really draw from an experience like that.

00:37:09 So a lot of things that you're obviously doing there's experience in terms of, you know,

00:37:14 working in a consulting, you know, B and then B projects and then, you know, keeping yourself

00:37:19 inspired and things like that. So I was wondering, how does a day in your life looks like?

00:37:29 My day in life is super boring. I, I think what I try to do, especially these days as

00:37:37 like when I get up, I go out of my house, to get a coffee somewhere, and just kind of

00:37:46 walk a little bit, to get into the mindset that I need to, you know, switch from, the

00:37:52 being at home to being at work. Work thing. Well, the, while both, are the same place.

00:38:01 And then, and then my day is usually split between like, tons of calls and, and then,

00:38:11 sometimes I try to preserve to actually be able to do some work and then at night. I

00:38:19 do literally the same thing. I just like close the computer and then go out for a walk and

00:38:24 come back. And then, you know, I, I read, or I watch some series or I, I do a little

00:38:31 bit of writing or something like that, but, it certainly isn't, super exciting these days.

00:38:41 Coming to the remote working aspect of it. Like, you know, the way the things are right

00:38:46 now, you know, have come up and come down to be. So how's it working for you? Like,

00:38:51 you know, when you're working remotely and, you know, try to make sense of various workshops

00:38:57 and people and users. So how has it impacted you?

00:39:01 Yeah. So I think, I have a little bit of an advantage because, most of my career I really

00:39:09 worked remote when I worked for Namecheap be very globally distributed team, we had

00:39:16 team members like literally all over the place, like from the U S all the way to India. so

00:39:22 I think like some of the basic habits of how to not get crazy in, in a world like this,

00:39:29 I already had, I know that, you know, I should get dressed and probably not stay in my PJ's

00:39:36 because it just like helps my mind function but, I think for, I think today, comparably

00:39:48 to do, I guess 10 years ago, for example, we have much better tools. The digital aspect

00:39:58 of the work. So we have like white boarding tools, right. Or wait behalf. I guess like

00:40:05 even the zoom VR on right now, like has now like, some great features, like the breakout

00:40:11 rooms or whatever, which before we would emulate by running in parallel multiple tools and

00:40:20 having multiple sessions running in parallel, like it was doable and it was just like little

00:40:25 bit like more tedious to do it. Right. So. I think, for me, it hasn't changed much besides

00:40:34 the fact that after working this way, for many, many years, I decided that I really,

00:40:41 need people around me. And, this current situation has taken that away a little bit from me.

00:40:47 And so I feel like tired by the constant, Constant digital interactions, right because

00:40:57 it's not the same thing as if you are talking to a real human but I think the biggest change

00:41:04 was for a lot of people I work with, this wasn't a normal thing to do. Like I think

00:41:10 on the technology side, like they're luckier that we are more comfortable with the digital

00:41:15 tours, but for people who are primarily used to talk to people and travel to meet people

00:41:23 and interact with people in real life and who weren t at all at the beginning of this

00:41:29 whole thing, he used to like video conferencing tools and stuff like that. It is still a little

00:41:35 bit of an adjustment they got really good at it, but it's still. Some things that come

00:41:41 natural to me or to my technologist s colleagues don't come naturally to people who are not

00:41:47 technologists. So they, we need to help them and they need a little bit of help, but it's

00:41:54 working to the best it can.

00:41:56 So you work with a lot of people, right from different disciplines and, you know, streams,

00:42:03 some of them are non-designers. So how do you emphasize the value of design and help

00:42:06 them?

00:42:07 I think my view on what design is, has changed tremendously over time. Right. I think, at

00:42:17 the very beginning, I, it was evolved. Like, how can I make this? Website's really pretty

00:42:24 right. And I, you know, like user testing, wasn't really a thing back then or whatever.

00:42:30 Like, it was just like really about, trying to show I can produce like a pretty website

00:42:38 but over the time I think that I realized that design is essentially an enabler, for

00:42:50 companies, that, and they can really help them too. I guess through challenging whether

00:42:58 the problem they are trying to solve is really the right problem to solve or helping them

00:43:03 understand, their users or their customers, to make sure that whatever they are building,

00:43:14 is actually doing something useful for the customer base that they have. Right. And so,

00:43:21 I do strongly believe that design is a team sport. It s, it's not something that like

00:43:26 I, as a designer can do on my own. I will always need other people or, or the users

00:43:32 or somebody who really understands very deeply to domain VR working in, to work with me.

00:43:40 But I think there is a really strong case that we can make, about how design can contribute

00:43:48 to do organizations, by really making sure we are building the right things for the right

00:43:56 people in the right way.

00:43:57 When you encounter, like, you know, so, different people come with different set of, you know,

00:44:04 mindset in terms of how they solve problems. And in the multi-disciplinary teams, there's

00:44:08 always these things, where, you know, there's a clash of ideas and specifically people who

00:44:12 are like a fade from design domain, let's say, let's talk about engineers in that case.

00:44:20 So when you were talking about some feature, let's say that you want to implement, and

00:44:23 then, you know, people are obviously not in the same frame of mind. So how do you get

00:44:27 that value of design or, you know, your thoughts processed, to them?

00:44:35 That's a good question. So I think that. There are times I've really struggled with engineers,

00:44:47 but, I think that, one thing that's super important then as that as designers, we should

00:44:55 be curious about. How the engineers work right or anybody for that matter like what are the

00:45:04 ways of working on their side and have a little bit of understanding how they think about

00:45:10 things, because that can help us to like kind of frame or phrase things in a way that they

00:45:17 can understand, in more easier way. I think what also helps is to bring them in, the process,

00:45:30 right as the design evolves and is created, because Dan VR sort of creating the culture

00:45:39 of co-creation and when we show them that. Like VR doing something because we have evidence

00:45:49 that that's the right thing to do then they are more likely, to just kind of contribute

00:45:57 and help us to really do, to get to the best outcome possible. And also I think like it's

00:46:04 about inviting them to really, Like it's about explaining to them how we do things as well.

00:46:12 Right because it's a two way street but also like, inviting them into, contributing their

00:46:22 ideas also helps.

00:46:24 Yeah that's, that's great, pointers some of them even, you know, some of them even I employ

00:46:31 in terms of doing it, coming to approaches in terms of, you know, find that deadline.

00:46:37 So all the ways I think there has always been a case where you have timeline and, you know,

00:46:42 a project that you need to do. And sometimes they are very short time, timelines that you

00:46:46 have to run in terms of sprints on maybe, you know, project. How do you manage that?

00:46:50 What is your approach and, you know, sort of solving these questions.

00:46:54 So I think I'm going to contradict myself a little bit that happens, that happens a

00:47:02 lot. And I think humans are the worst people in estimation. And there are other humans

00:47:07 who are like super terrible at like, giving people the time they need to actually do their

00:47:13 job properly. Right. It's I think it's too far. Like one thing is I try to make sure

00:47:20 that I have enough time, as much as I can by really pushing back on whoever is asking

00:47:25 me to do something crazy on a crazy timeline. And that has varying level of success. Right?

00:47:30 Like sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't and, I think there are two ways like that,

00:47:44 like, or two things that I do when it doesn't work. And one of them is like, I ended up

00:47:49 working really long hours and. Which is not sustainable. But then on the other hand, I

00:47:57 know that there are going to be periods where the workload is going to be lighter. So I

00:48:04 try to, I guess, balance that out this way and then the other thing is. You're just,

00:48:13 I sort of cut off the discovery or, you know, like the, you don't experiment that much.

00:48:20 You just like, kind of use your expertise and your best judgment to do whatever feels

00:48:27 the most reasonable and, which is obviously not the best way to do it, but sometimes it's

00:48:35 just what it is. Yeah, so true and in the diamonds, like these rate, what does keeping

00:48:41 you motivated? Like how do you motivate yourself? I think that a lot of the times it's just,

00:48:52 I'm fortunate enough to work on projects that, I really enjoy where most of the time with

00:48:59 people I really enjoyed working, enjoyed working with. So for me, It is about making sure that

00:49:07 the team gets to where they need to be by the time they need to be there. And so for

00:49:14 me, I think the biggest driver as the collaboration with the team and making sure that the team

00:49:22 really has what it needs. And, as a designer, what inspires you? I think its many things

00:49:32 and I think we talked about some of them already, right? So it's, it's a lot of it is just having

00:49:40 an open eyes and looking around and, and trying to understand why people are doing what they

00:49:45 are doing. And you wonder why people, I disagree with doing what they are doing, because I

00:49:51 think that's super helpful to gain some perspective. And then I have, lots of, I guess, references,

00:50:03 of people who are doing things that I really, thing is great stuff or, has some sort of

00:50:11 value and so. Funnily enough, like most of these people are not necessarily like super

00:50:20 well-known or, you know, like it might be just friends or it might be some other designers

00:50:24 that I studied with, or people from different, you know, from different areas that just,

00:50:31 I think like they are good at what they are doing and it just having conversations with

00:50:37 them, and just kind of understanding where they are at, just really, Sparks a lot of

00:50:45 ideas on my own.

00:50:47 Great. Do you know some advice for young and budding designers?

00:50:55 Ah, so I think, there's probably a few things one of them is, and we also talked a little

00:51:04 bit about it today already as. I would totally encourage, looking for as many diverse, experiences

00:51:12 as possible, because I think it helps you understand, like what, what you prefer, what's

00:51:17 your preferred way, or like, what are your preferred projects or what was your preferred

00:51:22 way of working and I think you can really only gain that by actually trying it out.

00:51:31 Because you can listen to like you re other peers and talk about their experiences. But

00:51:36 I think you've, we'll never know whether it's the right thing for you, unless you really

00:51:40 try it. And then I think it is okay to have dreams and I think its okay to dream bag,

00:51:53 and just sort of like I personally am not much of a planner. so like my approach to

00:52:00 this is like, I have like some dreams and aspirations and I just like, look for the

00:52:05 opportunities that sort of helped me get there which I think is a valid way to do it. But,

00:52:11 but there, I know a lot of people who have that North star and they really like reverse

00:52:19 engineered to plan how to get there. So I think like, so figure out like what's, what's,

00:52:23 what's the way, you want to go about it, but definitely, don't be shy and, and go for it.

00:52:33 I just, wondering. If my screen split at this point of time, the digital is for us, but

00:52:44 yeah thank you for sharing your thoughts with us today Katerina. This is a small token of

00:52:51 appreciation from us, for all the good work that you keep doing, and you're inspiring

00:52:57 us and the next generation of designers that are coming along, we wish to confer upon you.

00:53:03 The title of inspiring young designer, and I thank you so much for sharing and answering

00:53:09 our questions today.

00:53:11 Thank you for having me.

ABOUT THE VIDEO

Katerina joins us in this episode to talk about digital death and some interesting design perspectives to it. She talks about her challenges as a young designer and how she navigated through them.